hysics
(the science of everything) and astrophysical cosmology (the science of the universe),
curiously, have little to say about whether a person lives in a cosmos. For
physics and astronomical cosmology are activities persons pursue in their
world of daily life, as opposed to being disciplines which investigate the makeup of that
world. If one is a professional physicist or astronomer, a major part of one's
world of daily life is doing research which
is supposedly about "the whole", but to study this activity itself (the doing of the science
as opposed to the results of that doing) is not part of the whole the scientist studies.... |
|
There can be -- perhaps relatively rare -- times where
physics and cosmological theory do affect our life: when
professional physicists and astronomers determine that something in their
disciplinary domain is going to impact persons'
lives (e.g., if they discover that a very large asteroid was going to
strike the earth on 01 February 2019,
wiping out mammals like a previous
asteriod 65 million years ago wiped out dinosaurs). |
|
There are also times when
scientists turn their attention to their social activity of doing science. But then they consider themselves
not to be doing their science per se, but rather to be doing something
else: managing personnel, organizing symposia, etc. The world of daily life is not
part of "everything" (physics) and it is not part of "the universe" (astronomy). |
|
hat, then, is a cosmos? A cosmos is a
benignly ordered world of daily life, in which a warming [but not burning...] sun rises each morning,
the air is good to breath and the water good to drink, and in which one lives one's days
in the good company of good friends,
but one also can retreat to a private place (a "study",
or "tokonoma"...) when one wants to reflect quietly by oneself for a while --
assured that fellowship will still be their waiting for one's return when one
wishes to return to it. |
|
The physical order of a cosmos
is basically Aristotelean even if one is professionally a 21st-century
quantum/relativistic astro- or particle physicist.
While the physicist's theories assert that matter is mostly empty space,
if the physicist has to worry about his or her pen falling thru the "solid" top of their work desk
onto [or worse: through!] the floor, "something is wrong". The earth is flat, unless you take a
long flight in a jet airplane, etc. |
|
For deciding whether one lives in a cosmos,
supportive social relations are even more important than benign material conditions.
While everybody recognizes that an inmate of an internment camp is living in a carcel, not a cosmos,
and many can see that a pariah has been exiled from the cosmos, one needs to appreciate that
a person living in an anonymous megalopolis who has nobody who cares about them is not
living in a cosmos, either.
To live in a cosmos is to get up each morning looking forward to participating with good friends
in mutually meaningful and interesting
activities[fn.72],
and also looking further ahead to the coming
night in which one will go to bed either with a loved and desired partner, or, if one
goes to bed alone this night, confident of easily finding in the course of one's ordinary
daily life activities such a felicitous
partner with whom pleasurably and rewardingly to share one's life outside of
public time, and looking yet further ahead to appealing activities in the next morning which will
follow the coming evening -- a kind of "wheel of good karma"
[or "eternal recurrence of the same" good...].... |
|
To live in a cosmos is to find
meaning and gratification (and pleasure) in each of life's daily activities,
while also happily anticipating the next thing which lies ahead in one's day after this activity
shall be through.... A cosmos is a place where the two aspects of time: the eternity of the
present moment and the inexorable passing away of every present, are, as far as
possible for us mortals (who do, sooner or later, die, and, unless life is very
painful, always perceive death as coming too soon...) -- A cosmos is a place
where we are happy doing what we are doing [whatever it is] and we
also look forward to the next thing, both for the good it promises in itself, and
also because it promises to provide a balm for the anticipated loss of present goods which the present's passing away will
wrench away from us.... |
|
o you (I, we...)
live in a cosmos? Or do you (I, we...) live in a mere "universe",
i.e., some "Darwinean" process
where everything happens by the luck of circumstances, be they the
motions of Democritus's atoms, Hume's billiard balls, or today's stock,
commodities and other "markets"? In the end, to live in a cosmos is to
dwell in a caring but not intrusive face-to-face community of life, in which
the community provides each with what he or she needs to live fully, and
each person finds fulfillment in activities which sustain and further enhance the
community. |
|
Question: What difference would it make to persons living
such a life if their world of life, according to their current astronomical-cosmological
theory about it, was located (a) on the unique Edenic island at the center of Creation, or
(b) at some indifferent place on an
incidental speck of a small planet revolving around a middling star in some
undistinguished corner of a volumetrically infinite, galactically overpopulated universe?
Answer: It would change some specifics of the things they talk about in the
pleasant and edifying conversation which fills their days. |