|
Looking to the Ancients, Pierre Hadot Says Philosophy Should Be a Way of Life |
|
ierre
Hadot... is a philosopher who makes use
of the ancients for his own ideas. His... essays... show how these...
figures speak in modern voices [e.g.]... Marcus [Aurelius] as... someone
struggling in the privacy of his personal meditations to do
"what we are all trying to do," to "give a meaning to
our life." |
|
Through the last 40 years or so... Hadot has
returned again and again to particular themes -- that
philosophy is a lived experience, not a set of doctrines;
that philosophers consequently should be judged by how they
live their lives, what they do, not what they say; that
philosophy is best pursued orally, in dialogue and
community, not through written texts and lectures; that
philosophy as it is taught in universities today is for the
most part a distortion of its original, therapeutic
impulse.... |
|
Hadot explains that it was Socrates who defined the image
of the philosopher for antiquity.... Socrates taught that knowledge
was not a collection of propositions to be passed on from
teacher to pupil, but a manner of being, communicated
through dialogue. Famously, Socrates declared that he did
not know anything.... Once,
when challenged to quit his annoying irony and offer his
own definition of justice, he replied: "I never stop
showing what I think is just. If not in words, I show it by
my actions." At the heart of what Socrates meant by
knowledge, Hadot says, is a way of life, "a love of the
good." That love comes from within the individual, and
after it is awakened it must be renewed through
self-questioning, self-examination, a personal commitment
to a life of philosophy. |
|
"What characterized Socrates'
pedagogy," Hadot says, "was the fact that it attributed
capital importance to living contact between human beings;
and here Plato agreed." But if Plato played down the
written word in favor of an "ethics of dialogue," why,
then, did he write so much? ...Plato wrote, Hadot suggests, "because he
wanted above all to address not only the members of his
school, but also absent people and strangers...." |
|
Hadot... addresses the question...
when and how did philosophy change course and become the
academic discipline we know today? Already in the Roman
world the various schools had lost touch with their
founders' intentions and become more text-oriented, giving
rise to what Hadot terms "the Age of the Professors," a
phrase that this professor of ancient philosophy does not
use with approbation. He quotes Seneca on teachers who
talked the talk but did not walk the walk: "They turn love
of wisdom into love of words." |
|
"The goal is no longer, as it was in antiquity, to
train people for careers as human beings, but to train them
for careers as clerks or professors -- that is to say, as
specialists, theoreticians and retainers of specific items
of more or less esoteric knowledge." |
|
adot
does point to a countertradition, mainly but not
wholly outside the university, that continues to uphold the
ancient ideal, and it is clear that the names he names
constitute his own syllabus for modern philosophy. Among
those names are Erasmus, Montaigne ("My trade and my art
is living"), the Descartes of the "Meditations," Kant
("The idea of wisdom must be the foundation of
philosophy"), Emerson, Marx, Nietzsche, William James,
Wittgenstein, Jaspers...
Hadot speaks... about "an urgent need to
rediscover the ancient notion of the "philosopher"....
[T]he last, sermonlike pages
of "What Is Ancient Philosophy?" sound very much like an
elaborated version of the admonition that closes Rilke's
poem "Archaic Torso of Apollo": "You must change your
life." |
|
(--The New York Times Book Review, 18Aug02, p.10. Review of
Pierre Hadot's What is Ancient Philosophy, by Barry Gewen) |
|